Notes
|
-
This is primarily a method for determining the relative importance
of different project objectives (see section
4.2). Each of the secondary and tertiary objectives should be
weighed relative to the other secondary and tertiary objectives. It
is suggested that this may be most easily accomplished by scoring
individual objectives out of a hundred where 1 is "not important"
and 100 is "vitally important".
-
You would not expect to include any objectives whose importance
ranked below say, 10 as, on the scale of importance, this would probably
not be worth worrying about. If you feel this is not the case, it
probably signals the need to increase the importance of the relevant
objective.
-
Risks that are capable of preventing the achievement of the project
objective(s) should be listed under the secondary (rather than tertiary)
objectives.
-
If a risk has potential impact on the achievement of more than one
of the project objectives (secondary or tertiary) there is no need
to consider that risk more than once. Its potential effect on more
than one objective can be simply stated but it should be referred
to only once in any risk register so that only one action plan is
prepared to deal with its control or elimination.
|
