<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Never Waste a Good Crisis by Elemental &#187; Links for October 30th through November 5th</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Elemental &#187; Links for October 30th through November 5th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=35#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Never Waste a Good Cri... &#8211; Another report added to my &#39;must read and comment pile&#39;: &#34;Government, as a client, needs to understand the enlightened thinking that better and more intelligent designs improve patients&#8217; recovery in hospitals and learning outputs in schools. So, rather than reduce the number of schools and hospitals being built, it must sponsor smarter and more productive solutions and reduce the amount of money wasted on the procurement process. For Government as a policy maker, the challenge is to create an environment that incentivises innovation and speeds up the modernisation process.&#34; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Never Waste a Good Cri&#8230; &#8211; Another report added to my &#39;must read and comment pile&#39;: &quot;Government, as a client, needs to understand the enlightened thinking that better and more intelligent designs improve patients&rsquo; recovery in hospitals and learning outputs in schools. So, rather than reduce the number of schools and hospitals being built, it must sponsor smarter and more productive solutions and reduce the amount of money wasted on the procurement process. For Government as a policy maker, the challenge is to create an environment that incentivises innovation and speeds up the modernisation process.&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never Waste a Good Crisis by Tony Baldwinson</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Baldwinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=35#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Agreeing that "Surely the key comment is ‘there has been some progress, but nowhere near enough.’" and adding "We believe that the era of client-led change is over, at least for the moment, and that it is now time for the supply side ...." maybe we have to approach the problem differently.  I'd suggest that city-regions have a coherent labour market in construction as in other sectors, albeit that senior players are very mobile.
  So, low carbon city-regions will want a built environment which gives them a comparative advantage, and the refurbishment &amp; maintenance knowledge, skills, products and processes can be amassed into clusters of excellence.  City-focussed interventions might now give the most benefit, and urban trends in the USA seem to confirm this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreeing that &#8220;Surely the key comment is ‘there has been some progress, but nowhere near enough.’&#8221; and adding &#8220;We believe that the era of client-led change is over, at least for the moment, and that it is now time for the supply side &#8230;.&#8221; maybe we have to approach the problem differently.  I&#8217;d suggest that city-regions have a coherent labour market in construction as in other sectors, albeit that senior players are very mobile.<br />
  So, low carbon city-regions will want a built environment which gives them a comparative advantage, and the refurbishment &amp; maintenance knowledge, skills, products and processes can be amassed into clusters of excellence.  City-focussed interventions might now give the most benefit, and urban trends in the USA seem to confirm this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OFT seem to think lowest price bidding is good competition? (by Don Ward) by ContractorBids</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=32&#038;cpage=1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>ContractorBids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=32#comment-61</guid>
		<description>hmmmm I like this post but I would love to see some on how to save on construction costs in this tough market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmm I like this post but I would love to see some on how to save on construction costs in this tough market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never Waste a Good Crisis by Tim Pollard</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Pollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=35#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Surely the key comment is 'there has been some progress, but nowhere near enough.' The statements made are well put, and pertinent to the major issues which we all have to address. However, the evidence is that the appetite for change is little different and that effective change is only possible through legislation and regulation.
The 3Cs, cycnicism, conservatism and cost, still dominate the industry which is complex and divided. I fervently hope that this report gains more support and practical outcomes than it's predecessors, for all our sakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the key comment is &#8216;there has been some progress, but nowhere near enough.&#8217; The statements made are well put, and pertinent to the major issues which we all have to address. However, the evidence is that the appetite for change is little different and that effective change is only possible through legislation and regulation.<br />
The 3Cs, cycnicism, conservatism and cost, still dominate the industry which is complex and divided. I fervently hope that this report gains more support and practical outcomes than it&#8217;s predecessors, for all our sakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never Waste a Good Crisis by Tweets that mention Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment » Blog Archive » Never Waste a Good Crisis -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=35&#038;cpage=1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment » Blog Archive » Never Waste a Good Crisis -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=35#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Wilkinson and BernieJMitchell, constructingexc. constructingexc said: New CE blog post on Never Waste a Good Crisis. Sets the future agenda for industry improvement http://bit.ly/DEDTO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Wilkinson and BernieJMitchell, constructingexc. constructingexc said: New CE blog post on Never Waste a Good Crisis. Sets the future agenda for industry improvement <a href="http://bit.ly/DEDTO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/DEDTO</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OFT seem to think lowest price bidding is good competition? (by Don Ward) by Stephanie Villegas</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=32&#038;cpage=1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Villegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=32#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Don and Neil

It is wonderful to hear others echoing my own thoughts and many of my colleagues’ on this matter. As I work for a construction company that owes its success to repeat custom, I can only sympathise with the vulnerable bidders that have fallen prey to these schemes. 

Like Neil I cannot stress the importance of collaborative working during long-term projects enough.

Best Regards,
Stephanie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don and Neil</p>
<p>It is wonderful to hear others echoing my own thoughts and many of my colleagues’ on this matter. As I work for a construction company that owes its success to repeat custom, I can only sympathise with the vulnerable bidders that have fallen prey to these schemes. </p>
<p>Like Neil I cannot stress the importance of collaborative working during long-term projects enough.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Stephanie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics and the Built Environment (by Jon de Souza) by andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=26&#038;cpage=1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=26#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Jon

Interesting article.

I think in some areas ethical considerations are present for some at least in our industry at two levels - personal and organisational.

Although in hard times I wonder how much of this is so rigourously adhered to generally. It must be easier to be ethical when there is no shortage of work and times are good. 

Personally I had opportunities to go to Dubai, but one reason for not going was due to ethical issues of what was being built and how it gets built over there. It is likely these projects will still happen whether I am there or not, but personally I've made a choice not to, which included the ethics of actually being there and doing it

At an organisational level many years ago the company I work for chopped down a forest to build a fag factory. I doubt we'd do it again though, and  we now have ethical considerations in the bid process (ie should we be involved in this project at all), whether the organisation acts as a developer or builder or both. 

This considers issues such as reputational damage and whether a project (client, type of building etc) is aligned with our core principles, one of which is along the lines of: would you be happy seeing what you've done in the newspapers or on TV?

I'm not necessarily aware of where we have turned a job down on purely ethical grounds, partly because you don't usually get to hear of projects that we decide not to work on, and probably because the decisions are more complex than solely one issue.

Sometimes ethical issues are not clear cut though. Many years ago, I remember the former owners of our business recounting when they carried out an inspection of a warehouse they had built and were renting in the far east. They found a whole load of small children stitching footballs. The question then arose - shouldn't these children be in school and should we be building and renting units for these things to go on? They felt very uncomfortable. It transpired the children were all from poor families and none could afford to go to school, it being common practice to go out to work at an early age in that community. The choices generally being stitching footballs or being prostitutes. So which would we prefer?? At least in the football factory there was a chance their situation could be improved by providing some education.

So in summary i'd say ethics are considered (by some at least) as an up front issue. It's just probably you don't get to hear about it, and the projects that do go ahead which are ethically questionable are arranged, designed and built by those with less scruples, or less consideration for the ethical issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon</p>
<p>Interesting article.</p>
<p>I think in some areas ethical considerations are present for some at least in our industry at two levels - personal and organisational.</p>
<p>Although in hard times I wonder how much of this is so rigourously adhered to generally. It must be easier to be ethical when there is no shortage of work and times are good. </p>
<p>Personally I had opportunities to go to Dubai, but one reason for not going was due to ethical issues of what was being built and how it gets built over there. It is likely these projects will still happen whether I am there or not, but personally I&#8217;ve made a choice not to, which included the ethics of actually being there and doing it</p>
<p>At an organisational level many years ago the company I work for chopped down a forest to build a fag factory. I doubt we&#8217;d do it again though, and  we now have ethical considerations in the bid process (ie should we be involved in this project at all), whether the organisation acts as a developer or builder or both. </p>
<p>This considers issues such as reputational damage and whether a project (client, type of building etc) is aligned with our core principles, one of which is along the lines of: would you be happy seeing what you&#8217;ve done in the newspapers or on TV?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not necessarily aware of where we have turned a job down on purely ethical grounds, partly because you don&#8217;t usually get to hear of projects that we decide not to work on, and probably because the decisions are more complex than solely one issue.</p>
<p>Sometimes ethical issues are not clear cut though. Many years ago, I remember the former owners of our business recounting when they carried out an inspection of a warehouse they had built and were renting in the far east. They found a whole load of small children stitching footballs. The question then arose - shouldn&#8217;t these children be in school and should we be building and renting units for these things to go on? They felt very uncomfortable. It transpired the children were all from poor families and none could afford to go to school, it being common practice to go out to work at an early age in that community. The choices generally being stitching footballs or being prostitutes. So which would we prefer?? At least in the football factory there was a chance their situation could be improved by providing some education.</p>
<p>So in summary i&#8217;d say ethics are considered (by some at least) as an up front issue. It&#8217;s just probably you don&#8217;t get to hear about it, and the projects that do go ahead which are ethically questionable are arranged, designed and built by those with less scruples, or less consideration for the ethical issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics and the Built Environment (by Jon de Souza) by Elemental &#187; Links for September 25th through October 1st</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=26&#038;cpage=1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Elemental &#187; Links for September 25th through October 1st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=26#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ethics and the Built E... &#8211; If consultants only get involved at the Jus in Bello stage, is it ethical to build immoral buildings? Waiting avidly for part 2: &#34;At present, the discussions about ethical behaviours in construction largely consider what happens after a decision has been taken to construct &#8211; the Jus In Buildo stage if you will. (Told you). What is missing is consideration of that former stage &#8211; the question asked is &#8220;can we build it&#8221;, but not &#8220;should we&#8221;. This seems to chime with our view of the world &#8211; that there are some things that simply shouldn&#8217;t be built. I mean, can any of us really morally defend snow domes in Dubai?&#34; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Constructing Excellence in the Built Environment &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Ethics and the Built E&#8230; &#8211; If consultants only get involved at the Jus in Bello stage, is it ethical to build immoral buildings? Waiting avidly for part 2: &quot;At present, the discussions about ethical behaviours in construction largely consider what happens after a decision has been taken to construct &#8211; the Jus In Buildo stage if you will. (Told you). What is missing is consideration of that former stage &ndash; the question asked is &ldquo;can we build it&rdquo;, but not &ldquo;should we&rdquo;. This seems to chime with our view of the world &ndash; that there are some things that simply shouldn&rsquo;t be built. I mean, can any of us really morally defend snow domes in Dubai?&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OFT seem to think lowest price bidding is good competition? (by Don Ward) by Neil Tyson</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=32&#038;cpage=1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=32#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Don

I agree with you, I have always advocated to my clients the need to embrace partnership/collaborative working as a means to reducing fraud risks in long-term contracts. The key as you say is to think about this early in the process and to structure the contract and discussions with contractors around effective risk management (of which fraud is just one risk).

Regards
Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don</p>
<p>I agree with you, I have always advocated to my clients the need to embrace partnership/collaborative working as a means to reducing fraud risks in long-term contracts. The key as you say is to think about this early in the process and to structure the contract and discussions with contractors around effective risk management (of which fraud is just one risk).</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reverting to type (by Don Ward) by Kenny W.</title>
		<link>http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=12&#038;cpage=1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/?p=12#comment-19</guid>
		<description>After reading this blog makes me want to start my own :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this blog makes me want to start my own <img src='http://www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
